Analysis of Students’ Epistemic Reasoning and Understanding of the Solubility Equilibrium

Authors

Abstract

Solubility equilibria constitute an essential content of the introductory chemistry curriculum. To detect students’ learning difficulties regarding how such equilibrium is reached and what happens during this process, an open-ended questionnaire was designed. The answers were analysed by means of a phenomenographic analysis, which made it possible to define interpretative categories of the student body. The epistemological analysis of the arguments offers «intermediate explanations» between naive and scientific ideas, as well as fragmented answers and internal inconsistency. Our results show that the understanding of solubility equilibria is hampered by deficiencies in the understanding of the concepts of equilibrium, salt solubility and saturation of a solution as well as by difficulties to relate all these concepts.

Keywords

Solubility equilibria, Solubility, Saturation, Solubility curves, Explanatory categories

References

Adadan, E. y Savasci, F. (2012). An analysis of 16-17-year-old students’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts using a two-tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 513-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.636084

Bilgin, I., Şenocak, E., y Sözbilir, M. (2009). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problems in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75267

Blanco, A. y Prieto, T. (1997). Pupils’ views on how stirring and temperature affect the dissolution of a solid in a liquid: A cross‐age study (12 to 18). International Journal of Science Education, 19(3), 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190304

Çalik, M. (2005). A cross-age study of different perspectives in solution chemistry from junior to senior high school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(4), 671-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-005-1591-y

Çalik, M., Ayas, A. y Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-2732-3

Çalik, M., Ayas, A. y Coll, R. K. (2010). Investigating the effectiveness of teaching methods based on a four-step constructivist strategy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9176-0

Cam, A. y Geban, O. (2013). Effectiveness of case-based learning instruction on students’ understanding of solubility equilibrium concepts. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(44), 97-108. https://open.metu.edu.tr/handle/11511/53507

Chang, R. (2010). General chemistry: the essential concepts (10.ª ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Chi, M. T., Slotta, J. D. y De Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5

Dahsah, C. y Coll, R. K. (2007). Thai Grade 10 and 11 students’ conceptual understanding and ability to solve stoichiometry problems. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(2), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701250808

De Berg, K. (2012). A study of first-year chemistry students’ understanding of solution concentration at the tertiary level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 8-16. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1rp90056k

Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J. y Glažar, S. (2009). Assessing 16-year-old students’ understanding of aqueous solution at submicroscopic level. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 157-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9077-2

Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 481-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501

Ebenezer, J. V. y Erickson, G. L. (1996). Chemistry students’ conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography. Science Education, 80(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199604)80:2<181::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-C

Ebenezer, J. y Fraser, D. (2001). First year chemical engineering students’ conceptions of energy in solution processes: Phenomenographic categories for common knowledge construction. Science Education, 85, 509. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1021

Gorodetsky, M. y Gussarsky, E. (1986). Misconceptualization of the chemical equilibrium concept as revealed by different evaluation methods. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528860080409

Guisasola, J., Furió, C. y Ceberio, M. (2008). Science education based on developing guided research. Science education in focus, 173-201.

Gussarsky, E. y Gorodetsky, M. (1990). On the concept «chemical equilibrium»: The associative framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270303

Hackling, M. W. y Garnett, P. J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. The European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070211

Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and instruction, 12(2), 151-183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1202_4

Hofer, B. K. y Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of educational research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088

Hernando, M., Furió, C., Hernández, J. y Calatayud, M. L. (2003). Comprensión del equilibrio químico y dificultades en su aprendizaje. Enseñanza de las ciencias, 21(Extra 0), 111-118.

Johnstone, A. H. (2010). You can’t get there from here. Journal of chemical education, 87(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800026d

Kousathana, M. y Tsaparlis, G. (2002). Students’ errors in solving numerical chemical equilibrium problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1039/B0RP90030C

Krause, S. y Tasooji, A. (2007). Diagnosing students’ misconceptions on solubility and saturation for understanding of phase diagrams. En Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 12-540). https://peer

.asee.org/1699

Krause, S. J. y Isaacs-Sodeye, O. (2013). The effect of a visually-based intervention on students’ misconceptions related to solutions, solubility, and saturation in a core materials course. En 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1189). https://peer.asee.org/22574

Leach, J. y Scott, P. H. (2008). Teaching for the conceptual understanding: An approach drawing on individual and sociocultural perspective. En S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 647-675). Nueva York / Londres: Routledge.

Lee, O., Eichunger, D. C., Anderson, C. W., Berkheimer, G. D. y Blakeslee, T. D. (1993). Changing middle school students’ conceptions of matter and molecules. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300304

Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography-Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00132516

Marton, F. y Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Muchson, M., Kurniawati, R., Effendy, E. Agusningtyas, D. y Muntholib, M. (2020). Analysis of high school students’ metacognitive knowledge on the topic of solubility and solubility product. AIP Conference Proceedings 2215, 1, 020012. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000545

Mulford, D. R. y Robinson, W. R. (2002). An inventory for alternate conceptions among first-semester general chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 739-744. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed079p739

Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don’t learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of chemical education, 69(3), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed069p191

Nakhleh, M. B. (1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Identifying conceptual students in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p52

Nakiboğlu, C. y Nakiboğlu, N. (2019). Exploring prospective chemistry teachers’ perceptions of precipitation, conception of precipitation reactions and visualization of the sub-microscopic level of precipitation reactions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(4), 873-889. https://doi.org/

Nurrembern, S. C. y Pickering, M. (1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508-510. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed064p508

Onder, I. y Geban, O. (2006). The Effect of Conceptual Change Texts Oriented Instruction on Students’ Understanding of the Solubility Equilibrium Concept. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 30, 166-173. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/87725

Othman, J., Treagust, D. F. y Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2008). An investigation into the relationship between students’ conceptions of the particulate nature of matter and their understanding of chemical bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 30(11), 1531-1550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701459897

Pedrosa, M. A. y Dias, M. H. (2000). Chemistry textbook approaches to chemical equilibrium and student alternative conceptions. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90024A

Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D. y Bissonnette, C. (2011). Química General: Principios y aplicaciones modernas (10.ª ed.). Pearson Education, S. A.

Pinarbasi, T. y Canpolat, N. (2003). Pre-service teacher trainees’ understanding of solution chemistry concepts. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(11), 1328-1332. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed080p1328

Prain, V. y Hand, B. (1999). Students’ perceptions of writing for learning in secondary school science. Science Education, 83(2), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199903)83:2<151::aid-sce4>3.0.co;2-s

Prieto, T., Blanco, A. y Rodriguez, A. (1989). The ideas of 11 to 14‐year‐old students about the nature of solutions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(4), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110409

Quílez, J. (2004). Changes in concentration and in partial pressure in chemical equilibria: students’ and teachers’ misunderstandings. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1039/B3RP90033A

Raviolo, A. (2001). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding of solubility equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(5), 629-631. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed078p629

Raviolo, A., Schroh, N. T. y Farré, A. (2022). La comprensión de estudiantes de primer año de universidad del concepto de concentración expresada en gramos por litro. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 40(1), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3267

Rivard, L. P. (1994). A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969-983. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310910

Sawrey, B. A. (1990). Concept learning versus problem solving: revisited. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(3), 253-255. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed067p253

Scott, P., Asoko, H. y Leach, J. (2008). Student conceptions and conceptual learning science. En A. K. Abell y N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education. Nueva York: Routledge.

Setiowati, H., Utomo, S. B. y Ashadi (2018). Students’ misconceptions on solubility equilibrium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1022(1), 012035. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012035

Stavy, R. (1981). Teaching inverse functions via the concentrations of salt water solution. Archives de Psychologie, 49(191), 267-287.

Taber, K. S. (2006). Constructivism’s new clothes: The trivial, the contingent and a progressive research programme into learning of science. Foundations of Chemistry, 8, 189-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-005-4536-1

Tahirsylaj, A., Niebert, K. y Duschl, R. (2015). Curriculum and Didaktik in 21st century: Still divergent or converging? European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2(2), 262-281. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-62563

Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S. y Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic instrument to assess high school students’ understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10023

Thomas, P. L. y Schwenz, R. W. (1998). College physical chemistry students’ conceptions of equilibrium and fundamental thermodynamics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(10), 1151-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199812)35:10<1151::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-K

Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204

Tyson, L., Treagust, D. F. y Bucat, R. B. (1999). The complexity of teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 554-558. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p554

Uzuntiryaki, E. y Geban, Ö. (2005). Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts. Instructional Science, 33(4), 311-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-2812-z

Van Driel, J. H., De Vos, W., Verloop, N. y Dekkers, H. (1998). Developing secondary students’ conceptions of chemical reactions: The introduction of chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200401

Viennot, L. (2001). Reasoning in Physics: The part of common sense. Springer Science and Business media. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.39-4641

Vosniadou, S. (2012). Reframing the Classical Approach to Conceptual Change Preconceptions, Misconceptions and Synthetic Models. En B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin y C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (vol. I). Londres: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7

Vosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Frontiers in Education, 4(32). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00032

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. En M. Gauyain y M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (pp. 34-40). Scientific American Books.

Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J. y Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in Science. En D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science teaching and Learning (pp. 177-210). Macmillan Publications.

Wheeler, A. E. y Kass, H. (1978). Student misconceptions in chemical equilibrium. Science Education, 62(2), 223-232. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620212

Published

2023-06-05

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.