Integración de la tecnología en diseños de una actividad de aprendizaje: estudio de casos
Resumen
El estudio tiene por objetivo examinar los diseños de actividades mediadas por la tecnología creados por profesores de ciencias de secundaria a partir de la tecnología seleccionada, los conocimientos que orquestan y las contradicciones que emergen de la integración de la tecnología. Los diseños se analizaron en el marco del conocimiento tecnológico pedagógico y de contenido (TPACK) y de la teoría de la actividad (TA). Los hallazgos informaron que los profesores incluyen tecnología específica en el contenido, pero las metas de aprendizaje que formulan son de baja demanda cognitiva. Las principales contradicciones estuvieron asociadas a los conocimientos de los profesores, características de los estudiantes, acceso a la tecnología, reglas institucionales, etc. Finalmente, se discuten y se hacen recomendaciones para preparar a los profesores para la integración efectiva de la tecnología.
Palabras clave
TPACK, Teoría de la actividad, Diseño de actividades, Tecnología, ContradiccionesCitas
Anderson, L., y Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives.
Ariza, M. R., y Armenteros, A. Q. (2014). ICT and meaningful science learning. Ensenanza de Las Ciencias, 32(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.433
Ärlebäck, J. B. (2020). A case study of tensions and challenges arising as a swedish upper secondary teacher designs and implements a model development sequence on statistics. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37673-4_13
Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
Belfiori, L. (2014). Uso del marco TPACK por alumnos de un profesorado de matemáticas. In Acta Latinoamericana de Matemática Educativa (pp. 1733–1740).
Cresswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design; choosing among five approaches, 2d ed. In Reference and Research Book News (Vol. 22, Issue 2). Copyright Clearance Center.
Engeström, Y. (2014). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research, second edition. In Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814744
Engeström, Y, y Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
Engeström, Yrjö. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-konsultit.
Engeström, Yrjö. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice (pp. 377–404). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812774.025
Graham, C. R., Borup, J., y Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x
Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., Clair St., L., y Harris, R. (2009). TPACK development in science teaching: Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
Gregorcic, B., Etkina, E., y Planinsic, G. (2018). A new way of using the interactive whiteboard in a high school physics classroom: A case study. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9576-0
Harris, J., Grandgenett, N., y Hofer, M. (2015). Testing a TPACK-Based technology integration assessment rubric. In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010.
Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022
Jonassen, D. H., y Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., y Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
Laferrière, T., Hamel, C., y Searson, M. (2013). Barriers to successful implementation of technology integration in educational settings: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12034
Land, C. L., y Rubin, J. C. (2020). Part of the assignment: student–teachers’ planning instruction within/across activity systems. Teaching Education, 31(3), 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1546689
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall.
McCrory, R. (2008). Science, technology, and teaching: The topic-specific challenges of TPCK in science. In Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 193--206). Routledge New York.
Miles, M. B., y Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1098-2140(99)80125-8
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2012). Bases curriculares primero a sexto básico. Santiago: Unidad Curriculum y Evaluación.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2015). Nuevas bases curriculares y programas de estudio 7° y 8° año de educación básica/1° y 2° año de educación media. Santiago: Unidad Curriculum y Evaluación.
Ministerio de Educación de Chile. (2019). Bases curriculares 3° y 4° medio. Santiago: Unidad Curriculum y Evaluación.
Mishra, P., y Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and M. (2019). Science and engineering for grades 6-12: Investigation and design at the center (B. Moulding, N. Songer, y K. Brenner (eds.)). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25216
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Petko, D., Prasse, D., y Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
Pringle, R. M., Dawson, K., y Ritzhaupt, A. D. (2015). Integrating science and technology: Using technological pedagogical content knowledge as a framework to study the practices of science teachers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9553-9
Roussinos, D., y Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). Examining primary education teachers’ perceptions of TPACK and the related educational context factors. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1666323
Saritepeci, M. (2022). Modelling the effect of TPACK and computational thinking on classroom management in technology enriched courses. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 27(4), 1155–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09529-y
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., y Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Stinken-Rösner, L., Hofer, E., Rodenhauser, A., y Abels, S. (2023). Technology implementation in pre-service science teacher education based on the transformative view of tpack: effects on pre-service teachers’ TPACK, behavioral orientations and actions in practice. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070732
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wekerle, C., y Kollar, I. (2022). Using technology to promote student learning? An analysis of pre- and in-service teachers’ lesson plans. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(5), 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2083669
Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114
Xue, S., Du, J., y Yang, Y. (2021). Institutional influences on teachers’ classroom technology integration: A multi-case study of teachers’ uses of mobile social media at universities in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1996332
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (Sixth edit). SAGE.
Zwickl, B. M., Ikoro, V., y Allie, S. (2023). Characterizing lab environments using activity theory. The International Handbook of Physics Education Research: Teaching Physics, 10–11. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425712_010
Publicado
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2025 Lady Andrea López Rodríguez, Alejandra Meneses Arévalo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
