Evaluación de la vocación científica con cuestiones de identidad y capital científicos
Resumen
Este estudio explora la vocación STEM de los estudiantes de 15 años, analiza las diferencias según el género y el número de libros en el hogar y desarrolla un modelo predictivo de la vocación STEM a partir de cuestiones de identidad y capital científicos, operacionalizadas en cinco factores específicos. Los resultados estiman en un tercio los jóvenes con vocación STEM, aunque la tasa de indecisos es cercana a la mitad. Las diferencias de género confirman una moderada brecha y las diferencias no son significativas según el número de libros. El constructo identidad y capital científico es un gran predictor de la vocación STEM (38.02 %) y sus cinco factores producen un mejor modelo predictivo (43.8 %), donde el factor clases de ciencias es el predictor más potente. Se discute la utilidad del cuestionario y la necesidad de reforzar la función de orientación vocacional en las clases de ciencias.
Palabras clave
Vocación científica, Identidad científica, Capital científico, Diferencias de género, Modelo predictivoCitas
Archer, L., Dawson, E., Dewitt, J., Seakins, A. y Wong, B. (2015). «Science capital»: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending Bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 922-948. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
Avraamidou, L. (2020). Science identity as a landscape of becoming: rethinking recognition and emotions through an intersectionality lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 323-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09954-7
Avraamidou, L. y Schwartz, R. (2021). Who aspires to be a scientist/who is allowed in science? Science identity as a lens to exploring the political dimension of the nature of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(2), 337-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11422-021-10059-3/FIGURES/2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10059-3
Blickenstaff, J. C. (2005). Women and science careers: Leaky pipeline or gender filter? Gender and Education, 17(4), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500145072
Carlone, H. B. y Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Caspi, A., Gorsky, P., Nitzani-Hendel, R., Zacharia, Z., Rosenfeld, S., Berman, S. y Shildhouse, B. (2019). Ninth-grade students’ perceptions of the factors that led them to major in high school science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines. Science Education, 103(5), 1176-1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21524 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21524
Chang, M. J., Kevin Eagan, M., Lin, M. H. y Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the Impact of Racial Stigmas and Science Identity: Persistence Among Biomedical and Behavioral Science Aspirants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564. https://doi.org/10.1353/JHE.2011.0030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11777218
Chaurasia, M. A. y Juang, C.-F. (2022). Emerging IT/ICT and AI technologies affecting society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2940-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2940-3
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K. y Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
Chen, S. y Wei, B. (2022). Development and Validation of an Instrument to Measure High School Students’ Science Identity in Science Learning. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09932-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09932-y
Cohen, S. M., Hazari, Z., Mahadeo, J., Sonnert, G. y Sadler, P. M. (2021). Examining the effect of early STEM experiences as a form of STEM capital and identity capital on STEM identity: A gender study. Science Education, 105(6), 1126-1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.21670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21670
Danielsson, A. T., King, H., Godec, S. y Nyström, A. S. (2023). The identity turn in science education research: a critical review of methodologies in a consolidating field. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 18(3), 695-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11422-022-10130-7/TABLES/4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10130-7
DeWitt, J. y Archer, L. (2015). Who aspires to a science career? A comparison of survey responses from primary and secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 37(13), 2170-2192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1071899
DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Archer, L., Dillon, J., Willis, B. y Wong, B. (2013). Young children’s aspirations in science: The unequivocal, the uncertain and the unthinkable. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 1037-1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.608197
European Commission. (2004). Europe needs more scientists. Office for Official Publications of European Communities.
Hammond, A. S., Rubiano Matulevich, E. C., Beegle, K. G. y Kumaraswamy, S. K. (2020). The Equality Equation: Advancing the Participation of Women and Girls in STEM. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/789951595308672516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/34317
Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M. y Sonnert, G. (2013). The Science Identity of College Students: Exploring the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst13_042_05_82
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M. y Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: a gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978-1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
Jones, S. R. y McEwen, M. K. (2000). A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 41(4), 405-414.
Manassero-Mas, M. A., Bonnín, S. O. y Vázquez-Alonso, Á. (2025). Science Identity and Science Capital: Empirical Mapping from the Participation in Science at Secondary Schools. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(2), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.326
Manassero-Mas, M. A. y Vázquez-Alonso, Á. (2025 enviado). Participation and engagement in science and technology: Development and validation of an assessment instrument for secondary students.
Manassero-Mas, M. A. y Vázquez-Alonso, Á. (2025). A predictive analysis of STEM vocation through students’ attitudes to school science classes. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1506038. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2025.1506038/BIBTEX DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1506038
Manstead, A. S. R., Hewstone, M., Fiske, S. T., Hogg, M. A., Reis, H. T. y Semin, G. R. (Eds.) (1995). The Blackwell encyclopaedia of social psychology. Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631202899.1996.00001.x
McDonald, M. M., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K. y Escobar, M. (2019). A Single-Item Measure for Assessing STEM Identity. Frontiers in Education, 4, 466789. https://doi.org/10.3389/FEDUC.2019.00078/BIBTEX DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00078
Miles, J. A. y Naumann, S. E. (2021). Science self-efficacy in the relationship between gender and science identity. International Journal of Science Education, 43(17), 2769-2790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1986647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1986647
Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J. y MacLeod, E. (2021). Who has high science capital? An exploration of emerging patterns of science capital among students aged 17/18 in England. Research Papers in Education, 36(4), 402-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1678062 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1678062
Murphy, K. M. y Kelp, N. C. (2023). Undergraduate STEM students’ science communication skills, science identity, and science self-efficacy influence their motivations and behaviours in STEM community engagement. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00182-22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00182-22
Nadelson, L. S., McGuire, S. P., Davis, K. A., Farid, A., Hardy, K. K., Hsu, Y.-C., et al. (2015). Am I a STEM professional? Documenting STEM student professional identity development. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1070819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1070819
OECD. (2025). The State of Global Teenage Career Preparation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d5f8e3f2-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/d5f8e3f2-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2025 science framework (draft). OECD Publishing. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Vol. I): Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
Palmer, T. A., Burke, P. F. y Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: A study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949
Rodríguez González, E. (2011). Ciencia y tecnología: ¿En qué piensan los jóvenes 2.0? En Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (Ed.), Percepción Social de la Ciencia y la Tecnología en España (pp. 203-235).
Sandrone, S. (2022). Science identity and its «Identity Crisis»: On science identity and strategies to foster self-efficacy and sense of belonging in STEM. Frontiers in Education, 7, 871869. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.871869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.871869
Sjøberg, S. y Schreiner, C. (2019). ROSE (The relevance of science education): The development, key findings and impacts of an international low cost comparative project. ROSE Final Report, Part 1. University of Oslo.
Stets, J. E., Brenner, P. S., Burke, P. J. y Serpe, R. T. (2017). The science identity and entering a science occupation. Social Science Research, 64, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2016.10.016
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge University Press.
Tang, C., Yi, T., Naumann, S. E. y Dong, J. (2024). The influence of subjective norms and science identity on academic career intentions. Higher Education, 87, 1937-1956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01099-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01099-5
Vázquez Alonso, A. y Manassero Mas, M. A. (2009). Patrones actitudinales de la vocación científica y tecnológica en chicas y chicos de secundaria. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35362/RIE5041879 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35362/rie5041879
Vincent-Ruz, P. y Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(48), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5
Wagner, C. J. (2024). Toward a Shared Conception of Children’s Content Area Identities in Literacy, Math, and Science: A Systematic Integrative Review. Review of Educational Research, 94(3), 343-375. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231184888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231184888
Publicado
Cómo citar
Descargas
Datos de los fondos
-
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Números de la subvención PID2020-114191RB-I00
Derechos de autor 2026 María-Antonia Manassero-Mas, Ángel Vázquez Alonso

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.